Evolutionary versus Revolutionary Data Centers
Unni NarayananMonday, August 17th, 2009
Microsoft’s and Google’s contrasting data center strategies reflect the differences between evolutionary and revolutionary approaches in technology implementation. History has proven that each paradigm has its own risks and rewards.
MSFT is riding the well known trends toward the usage of data center containers. This natural evolutionary approach requires a minimum investment in surrounding building infrastructure and a reliance on broadly available commodity hardware. The benefits here are a complete negation of risks related to specific vendor exposure and wasted dollars on potentially fruitless R&D efforts. In a sense MSFT is waiting for the risk/reward pareto point to clearly emerge from natural market forces. Historically this is consistent with MSFT’s development efforts (e.g., their DOS relationship with IBM or their relatively late but successful offering with Windows as compared to Apple’s products).
In contrast GOOG believes it already understands the nature of that elusive optimal data center solution. GOOG’s teams rightfully view themselves as technology visionaries and want to take a revolutionary approach in design. Hence, GOOG needs to develop custom hardware solutions. This strategy has not always paid off. For example, GOOG vacillated between purchasing servers from vendors such as RACK and designing their own compute platform solutions. And yet, our checks at Primary Global Research indicate that for the time being GOOG’s data center approach is a standard that many wish to emulate.
And, while the data center design battle rages, in the backdrop state tax laws are in flux. This is an issue that transcends both the evolutionary and revolutionary approaches. Neither MSFT nor GOOG can predict the political whims of the taxpayer – especially, when data center consolidation drives lower TCO (totally cost of ownership) and that savings is largely a result of reduced headcount. Once the legal ambiguities dissipate, the battle lines will be more cleanly drawn and, as Ashlee Vance writes in his recent NY Times Bits blog column, the evolutionists and revolutionists will be fighting in a neighborhood near you!
Tags: Data Center, GOOG, MSFT
Posted in Data Center, Unni Narayanan | No Comments »
More MSFT vs. GOOG – And What’s YHOO Got?
Laxmi PoruriTuesday, July 21st, 2009
So the big battle of words begins. MSFT vs. GOOG and their war for the desktop. Does anyone know why Ballmer is still CEO? I don’t get it.
We have been hearing that GOOG has had some chinks in the armor of late. Its datacenters that house GOOG apps were hacked and caused some issues last week with Twitter. Could this be a sign of weakness?
Not without its flaws, Google had its Base and its YouTube – a little too much hype and not enough substance – a rarity for them, but nevertheless punctures their aura of invincibility.
Also YHOO reports today and we expect another choke, so to speak. Every time I talk to advertisers, they always tell me that ROI on YHOO is dropping faster than an extreme skier in a Warren Miller flick. They’d better pick something they are good at (which is tough these days) – and pick it soon. The longer they wait, the better for MSFT.
Tags: GOOG, MSFT, YHOO
Posted in Laxmi Poruri | No Comments »
