Mobile Packet Core — Ready to Take off
Rajan VaradarajanWednesday, February 10th, 2010
Renewed interest in packet core networks over the past several months has generated new product announcements from infrastructure equipment vendors and touched off a round of acquisitions in the space as well.
I should say that packet core networks are not new. They’ve been used to backhaul IP data traffic to servers and other nodes on the Internet since the days of 2.5 G/GPRS networks. The central player in the packet core network is the Gateway GPRS support node (GGSN) in GSM/UMTS networks — a powerful router that performs multiple functions including user authentication, traffic forwarding and management, support for thousands of sessions, data records/billing, tunneling across multiple GGSNs, etc.
That said, the packet core network’s new prominence is the result of a phenomenal increase in mobile data applications and traffic driven largely the result of a multitude of all-you-can-eat data plans from carriers. Another significant factor driving demand for packet core routers is WiMAX, which is being adopted at a great rate for fixed and nomadic IP data applications, especially in developing nations. The ASN gateway packet node is the key component of WiMAX’s core and, although not a cellular network substitution or replacement, there is a sizeable overlap in the functionality of the ASN gateway and cellular networks’ packet core nodes.
Looking ahead, as the industry moves through the transition to Long Term Evolution (LTE), often categorized as 4G technology, the packet core needs equipment that not only meets today’s amped-up capability requirements but must accommodate future expansion as well. Interestingly, several packet core node vendors are targeting sales to the LTE core network, also known as the Evolved Packet Core (EPC). Unlike today’s 3G networks, EPC provides an “all-IP” aspect that carries voice traffic over IP.
Girding up for what’s next
Packet core equipment vendors include the traditional mobile infrastructure market leaders, among them Ericsson, Nokia, Siemens, Alcatel-Lucent, Hitachi (which recently acquired Nortel), Huawei and ZTE. But smaller startup companies are also making their presence known. For example, WiChorus saw initial success in the WiMAX space and enhanced its product line with offerings for the LTE Market. Tellabs recently acquired WiChorus and will integrate its product into the highly successful 8800 Multiservice Router.
Cisco also acquired a small startup, Starent, in response to its recent success with Verizon. Starent’s ST-series Multimedia Core Platforms connect to multiple types of access networks, including UMTS, WiMAX and LTE EPC. The core software runs StarOS, a variant on Linux, and the platforms incorporate hot swap capability, redundancy, and a variety of other carrier class features. Unlike the larger vendors, Starent and WiChorus offer software systems that are easier to scale for various uses and capacities. Their core products are purpose built and designed from the ground up.
A number of equipment vendors, including Hitachi, NEC, NSN and ZTE, offer modified Advanced Telecommunications Computing Architecture (ATCA) platforms as the basis for their packet core nodes. These “Big Iron” packet core nodes have a multi slot chassis populated with high capacity cards and often have network processors/ASICs/switching devices. The network processors/ASICs are useful for deep packet inspection (DPI) that, allows the node to shape/police/report traffic based on embedded content although no operator will publicly admit it. Companies such as Ericsson and Starent rely on custom-built platforms to address this market.
Ready and not
It will be interesting to see Juniper’s roadmap for the packet core network as it is fleshed out over the next few months. Juniper was supposed to partner with Starent, but instead was acquired by Cisco. Juniper also partnered with Ericsson for the 3G packet core (GGSN), but won’t be involved on 4G equipment. And Ericsson’s 2006 acquisition of Redback appears prescient as it provides credibility for the company’s IP technology with the service provider network.
Some reports have Alcatel-Lucent addressing the packet core by adding functions to the 7750 service router platform, which they gained in the TiMetra acquisition and saw significant success with in the metro Ethernet space. This also has high credibility with service providers.
Lastly, Huawei’s success in Europe and Asia does not make it a major player in the North American market. Observers indicate Huawei’s presence depressed bids and profits of European manufacturers of next generation packet cores.
Tags: Alcatel-Lucent, Ericsson, Hitachi, Huawei, Juniper, NEC, Nokia, Nortel, Siemens, Starent, WiChorus, WiMAX, ZTE
Posted in Author, Networking, Rajan Varadarajan, Telco | No Comments »
Wall Street’s Embrace a Precursor of Enterprise Acceptance
Unni NarayananThursday, July 2nd, 2009
Wall Street’s adoption of cutting edge technology has always been a precursor to broader mainstream enterprise acceptance. The reason is that financial firms — and trading companies, particularly — are comfortable with a higher degree of risk. As a result, Wall Street seems to gravitate to technologies at precisely the instant these technologies start to have favorable risk/reward profiles. There are numerous examples, ranging from Salomon Brothers’ aggressive utilization of higher end workstations like Sun in the 1980s to the Nasdaq’s implementation of its Supermontage system.
In this context, Ben Worthen’s June 29 story in the Wall Street Journal, “Remaking the NYSE’s Data Center” highlights a couple of interesting points: 1.) NYSE CIO Steve Rubinow states the exchange is utilizing a best-of-breed approach. This is consistent with where the data center design is headed. For example our checks at Primary Global Research indicate no single vendor is going to “own” a vision for cloud computing. It is more likely that cloud computing architectures will organically unfold as IT managers (as in the case with the NYSE) piece together an optimal solution; 2.) That the vendor list includes Juniper, Ciena, and Voltaire is notable for several reasons. First, there is the obvious non-mention of Cisco, which is part of a broader statement that competitors are closing the gap. But, more interesting is the revelation that NYSE’s design uses optical networking products (Ciena) and will implement Infiniband (Voltaire). Infiniband has been relegated to the high performance computing niche (think Livermore Labs, etc.) for years. Perhaps these technologies are at inflection points where we might see more widespread usage.
Although many enterprises do not push the envelope in a manner that requires the “renting of space” for proximity reasons in the data center, one thing remains clear: demand for performance and bandwidth remains unfulfilled and numerous emerging technology companies are finally in an attractive sweet spot to address these challenges and reap the rewards.
Tags: Ciena, Cisco, Juniper, Voltaire
Posted in Data Center, Technology, Unni Narayanan | No Comments »
