IT Services Weather: Cloudy with a High Likelihood of More Cloud. Meanwhile, Fresh Breezes Blow In Co-Lo
Unni NarayananMonday, August 30th, 2010
Co-location services and cloud solutions are becoming more affordable as technology improves and vendor competition increases. PGR's expert community in this sector is enthusiastic about the proliferation of cloud computing, seeing a host of new players gathering on the horizon creating new storm centers that will sweep into the sector and steal some thunder from current players.
Enthusiasm and investment in the space are driving new opportunities and startups. Clearly, the advent of additional competition and the pace of adoption of cloud solutions, are setting the stage for more affordable options in both co-location and the cloud. So, while AMZN, the leading cloud services provider, is expected to retain its lead, its position will be challenged by more affordable alternatives.
For those enterprises uninterested or not ready to run in the cloud, a fresh wind is blowing in the co-location sector where capacity is increasing as vendors implement new efficiencies – minimum requirements now range between 100-200 watts-per-square-foot and as high as 350 watts could be seen in the near future – and new data centers come online. Just six months ago there was hardly any air to be felt in the sector as capacity was tight and co-lo vendors weren’t giving any breaks. Today, our network reports that vendors have become much more accommodating. For the short-term anyway, this marks the end of the capacity shortage in co-location.
All that said, the cloud’s the thing. Industry interest is clearly shifting from co-lo to cloud proliferation and development. As noted above, AMZN’s ease-of-value proposition has secured its position at the top but customers are going to be attracted by more affordable vendors like RAX and MSFT Azure. Speaking of those players, PGR’s experts are uncertain how successful RAX’s open sourcing of its Slicehost acquisition will be. There is very little confidence that SVVS has a viable cloud offering. However, our network thinks highly of MSFT Azure’s opportunity with the expectation it will have a significant impact within the next year and may even challenge CRM in SaaS.
Tags: AMZN, Cloud Computing, Co-location, Data Center, RAX, SAAS, SVVS
Posted in Cloud Computing, Data Center, Technology, Unni Narayanan | No Comments »
Evolutionary versus Revolutionary Data Centers
Unni NarayananMonday, August 17th, 2009
Microsoft’s and Google’s contrasting data center strategies reflect the differences between evolutionary and revolutionary approaches in technology implementation. History has proven that each paradigm has its own risks and rewards.
MSFT is riding the well known trends toward the usage of data center containers. This natural evolutionary approach requires a minimum investment in surrounding building infrastructure and a reliance on broadly available commodity hardware. The benefits here are a complete negation of risks related to specific vendor exposure and wasted dollars on potentially fruitless R&D efforts. In a sense MSFT is waiting for the risk/reward pareto point to clearly emerge from natural market forces. Historically this is consistent with MSFT’s development efforts (e.g., their DOS relationship with IBM or their relatively late but successful offering with Windows as compared to Apple’s products).
In contrast GOOG believes it already understands the nature of that elusive optimal data center solution. GOOG’s teams rightfully view themselves as technology visionaries and want to take a revolutionary approach in design. Hence, GOOG needs to develop custom hardware solutions. This strategy has not always paid off. For example, GOOG vacillated between purchasing servers from vendors such as RACK and designing their own compute platform solutions. And yet, our checks at Primary Global Research indicate that for the time being GOOG’s data center approach is a standard that many wish to emulate.
And, while the data center design battle rages, in the backdrop state tax laws are in flux. This is an issue that transcends both the evolutionary and revolutionary approaches. Neither MSFT nor GOOG can predict the political whims of the taxpayer – especially, when data center consolidation drives lower TCO (totally cost of ownership) and that savings is largely a result of reduced headcount. Once the legal ambiguities dissipate, the battle lines will be more cleanly drawn and, as Ashlee Vance writes in his recent NY Times Bits blog column, the evolutionists and revolutionists will be fighting in a neighborhood near you!
Tags: Data Center, GOOG, MSFT
Posted in Data Center, Unni Narayanan | No Comments »
