Latest Trends in Optical Networking: 100G & Next-Generation ROADMs
Rajan VaradarajanFriday, June 18th, 2010
There has been a renewal of interest in optical networking companies recently with the anticipated shift to 100G technologies poised to happen soon. Various players are positioning themselves for this big industry shift. Along with this interest in all things 100G, there is also an industry evolution from the early generations of ROADM technology (Reconfigurable Optical Add Drop Multiplexer) to newer versions that provide a significantly higher degree of flexibility and reconfigurability.
Reconfigurable Optical Add/Drop Multiplexers (ROADMs) technically refer to a network element that has the capability of adding/dropping selected wavelengths for local traffic as well as redirecting express traffic to other directions in a multi-degree node. The “Reconfigurable” part in ROADM refers to the ability to do this local add/drop as well as the redirection of express wavelengths in a dynamic fashion from a remote network operations center and without manual re-fibers of line cards and with minimal pre-planning to account for uncertain traffic patterns. This reconfigurability is the key to efficient network adaptation to unforeseen demand patterns and customer connects/disconnects without costly service disruptions. The term ROADM, has been used more broadly than just the network element itself and has been used to refer to (a) an optical transport system that incorporates ROADM technology, and (b) optical components and sub-systems (made by companies such as JDSU) that form the building blocks of the ROADM system.
100G networking and associated optical products can be broadly classified into (a) client side, short-reach, standardized, pluggable optical modules that are used to connect short reaches between routers/switches and transport equipment or among switches, and (b) line side models, DWDM interfaces that are proprietary, vendor specific and cover distances of 1,000 - 2,000 km.
Early low-volume shipments of client side interfaces, which are standardized by IEEE, have commenced and the key players for these interfaces are Finisar, Santur and Opnext. The client side models have not yet reached attractive price points compared to 10G modules, hence slow uptake of the models is projected until the cost-volume positive feedback cycle kicks into higher gear. While early parts are sampling this year, rapid market adoption is highly predicated on the cost points of the modules.
On the DWDM line side that covers geographical reaches across regional, long-haul or ultra-long haul distances, there has been a concerted effort by all major optical equipment vendors to introduce 100G capable systems. The advantages of 100G on the line side are very compelling, as it increases the fiber capacity to 8 Tb/s and the preferred technology path using coherent optical transmission provides a number of additional advantages of simpler link design and inherent compensation of some fiber impairments such as chromatic and polarization mode dispersion. The advantages of 100G systems and reasonable price points relative to 10G systems will facilitate line adoption of 100G; it is expected to occur rapidly once systems are available in early to mid 2011. While early versions of 100G line side technology are available now, optimized and field deployable systems are expected in 2011. The major players in this space are Ciena/Nortel, Alcatel-Lucent, Nokia-Siemens, Huawei and Infinera. Each of the vendors has announced slightly varying flavors of the technology and approaches. With the R&D focus on 100G and coherent technology and the commoditization of 10G technology, it appears that 40G technology is being squeezed out in carrier applications (for both line side and client side applications). This was reinforced by Infinera’s recently announced decision to discontinue 40G non-coherent PIC (Photonic Integrated Circuit) and focus resources on 100G coherent technology in a PIC.
Along with the evolution from 10G to 100G discussed above, the other major area of interest in the optical networking space is the emergence and adoption of next-generation ROADMs that provide colorless, directionless and contentionless capabilities. The first generation of ROADMs introduced in 2003-2004 enabled the carriers to add/drop some wavelengths without disrupting other wavelengths. While this provided a huge improvement over the previous method of operation, it still had a number of limitations in terms of a fully automated reconfigurability. Newer optical building blocks and lower costs are enabling the realization of next-generation ROADM architectures which remove these limitations. Directionless ROADMs enable a common bank of transponders to connect to any direction in a multi-degree node. Colorless ROADMs enable a transponder to flexibly connect to any mux/demux port and contentionless ROADMs enable use of the same wavelength in different segments of a network with a common node. The key building blocks for these new levels of reconfigurability is higher port count WSS (Wavelength Selective Switches) and smaller, lower cost WSS switches. These advances are expected to catalyze the ROADM market and continue the high growth trajectory of this sub-segment of the optical component space and continue to benefit ROADM market leaders like JDSU.
Posted in Internet, Networking, Rajan Varadarajan, Technology, Telco | No Comments »
Mobile Packet Core — Ready to Take off
Rajan VaradarajanWednesday, February 10th, 2010
Renewed interest in packet core networks over the past several months has generated new product announcements from infrastructure equipment vendors and touched off a round of acquisitions in the space as well.
I should say that packet core networks are not new. They’ve been used to backhaul IP data traffic to servers and other nodes on the Internet since the days of 2.5 G/GPRS networks. The central player in the packet core network is the Gateway GPRS support node (GGSN) in GSM/UMTS networks — a powerful router that performs multiple functions including user authentication, traffic forwarding and management, support for thousands of sessions, data records/billing, tunneling across multiple GGSNs, etc.
That said, the packet core network’s new prominence is the result of a phenomenal increase in mobile data applications and traffic driven largely the result of a multitude of all-you-can-eat data plans from carriers. Another significant factor driving demand for packet core routers is WiMAX, which is being adopted at a great rate for fixed and nomadic IP data applications, especially in developing nations. The ASN gateway packet node is the key component of WiMAX’s core and, although not a cellular network substitution or replacement, there is a sizeable overlap in the functionality of the ASN gateway and cellular networks’ packet core nodes.
Looking ahead, as the industry moves through the transition to Long Term Evolution (LTE), often categorized as 4G technology, the packet core needs equipment that not only meets today’s amped-up capability requirements but must accommodate future expansion as well. Interestingly, several packet core node vendors are targeting sales to the LTE core network, also known as the Evolved Packet Core (EPC). Unlike today’s 3G networks, EPC provides an “all-IP” aspect that carries voice traffic over IP.
Girding up for what’s next
Packet core equipment vendors include the traditional mobile infrastructure market leaders, among them Ericsson, Nokia, Siemens, Alcatel-Lucent, Hitachi (which recently acquired Nortel), Huawei and ZTE. But smaller startup companies are also making their presence known. For example, WiChorus saw initial success in the WiMAX space and enhanced its product line with offerings for the LTE Market. Tellabs recently acquired WiChorus and will integrate its product into the highly successful 8800 Multiservice Router.
Cisco also acquired a small startup, Starent, in response to its recent success with Verizon. Starent’s ST-series Multimedia Core Platforms connect to multiple types of access networks, including UMTS, WiMAX and LTE EPC. The core software runs StarOS, a variant on Linux, and the platforms incorporate hot swap capability, redundancy, and a variety of other carrier class features. Unlike the larger vendors, Starent and WiChorus offer software systems that are easier to scale for various uses and capacities. Their core products are purpose built and designed from the ground up.
A number of equipment vendors, including Hitachi, NEC, NSN and ZTE, offer modified Advanced Telecommunications Computing Architecture (ATCA) platforms as the basis for their packet core nodes. These “Big Iron” packet core nodes have a multi slot chassis populated with high capacity cards and often have network processors/ASICs/switching devices. The network processors/ASICs are useful for deep packet inspection (DPI) that, allows the node to shape/police/report traffic based on embedded content although no operator will publicly admit it. Companies such as Ericsson and Starent rely on custom-built platforms to address this market.
Ready and not
It will be interesting to see Juniper’s roadmap for the packet core network as it is fleshed out over the next few months. Juniper was supposed to partner with Starent, but instead was acquired by Cisco. Juniper also partnered with Ericsson for the 3G packet core (GGSN), but won’t be involved on 4G equipment. And Ericsson’s 2006 acquisition of Redback appears prescient as it provides credibility for the company’s IP technology with the service provider network.
Some reports have Alcatel-Lucent addressing the packet core by adding functions to the 7750 service router platform, which they gained in the TiMetra acquisition and saw significant success with in the metro Ethernet space. This also has high credibility with service providers.
Lastly, Huawei’s success in Europe and Asia does not make it a major player in the North American market. Observers indicate Huawei’s presence depressed bids and profits of European manufacturers of next generation packet cores.
Tags: Alcatel-Lucent, Ericsson, Hitachi, Huawei, Juniper, NEC, Nokia, Nortel, Siemens, Starent, WiChorus, WiMAX, ZTE
Posted in Author, Networking, Rajan Varadarajan, Telco | No Comments »
You Heard It Here First: BRCD a Winner in 2010
Unni NarayananTuesday, January 26th, 2010
Any number of pundits will tell you BRCD is on the ropes, hanging by a fingernail, ready to succumb to a combination of 1.) flat growth rates in FC and, consequently, no TAM to fuel BRCD’s expansion in the data center; 2.) technology obsolescence at the hands of FCoE and big price and margin erosion in core storage products due to insufficient differentiation; then 3.) a plunge into the really deep end with the Foundry acquisition, which the punditry avers will destroy BRCD’s very foundation.
Sounds pretty bad. But wait! Our checks show BRCD is far from rolling over, taking it on the chin or moving to the Jersey Shore. In fact, PGR’s network accentuates the positive noting BRCD style and panache that should stand it very well this year. Check it out:
FC demand is robust because of refreshes and green-field opportunities. If someone counted the total number of FC cable, HBAS and switches in 2010 vs. 2009, they might not see a big difference but it seems no one is counting the huge “rip and replace” opportunity in the ongoing storage and data center consolidation build out.
There is a huge co-location capacity squeeze. New co-lo space is expected to come on line throughout 2010. And, although SANs by and large do not saturate BRCD 8Gb/sec Director class switches, it is only an INCREMENTAL cost to refresh the SAN with high-performance products as part of an upgrade in the co-los. Furthermore, BRCD is well positioned to handle FCoE when it becomes real. That and CSCO has stopped attempting to “buy accounts” with the largely unimpressive Andiamo legacy products. Hence, we do not expect accelerating product erosion.
Everyone likes to say that if BRCD could “do it over again,” they would have given the Foundry acquisition a second thought. However, the reality is that BRCD controls its own destiny if it can manage the integration of the Foundry products well. In that scenario, it is quite possible for BRCD to “pick off” some incremental share from the likes of JNPR. And, with sufficient effort, they can move up in the networking hierarchy. HPQ’s acquisition of COMS is the end of any possible merger with BRCD because the war in the data center between CSCO and HPQ will center around the winner of the storage battle. All that and BRCD is a free agent that can join either side.
Not so bad after all, we say.
Tags: BRCD, Brocade, CSCO, FCoE, Foundry, HPQ
Posted in Data Center, Networking, Unni Narayanan | No Comments »
HPQ: Network Rookie
Unni NarayananMonday, August 10th, 2009
On paper at least, HPQ looked like a “shoo-in” to join the networking big time with its Procurve offering. And I must confess, I have been cheering for the rookie if only to give CSCO, the salty veteran of interconnectivity, some competition.
However, PGR’s talent scouts (HPQ/CSCO experts) report a completely different story. Specifically: 1) HPQ has a poor track record with networking hardware, 2) The “go to market” strategy around Procurve is nonexistent, 3) Organizational changes at HPQ don’t appear to favor good execution around Procurve, and 4) CSCO just has a better sales force. Still, important questions remain in terms of which player will ultimately win the data center. For example, CSCO’s blade strategy has momentum largely because CSCO’s name is on it (not because there’s a real product).
As they say in sports, come game time, both rookie and veteran have to show up and play. HPQ’s presence on the server side is real. The question is whether HPQ can leverage the talent to raise its game.
Tags: CSCO, HPQ
Posted in Cloud Computing, Data Center, Networking, Unni Narayanan | No Comments »
Cisco’s Blade Server Strategy
Rajan VaradarajanWednesday, July 1st, 2009
Cisco already has had dominant market share in its core businesses. In looking for new sources of revenue and continued growth, the company saw the datacenter virtualization trend as a great opportunity. Perhaps it was a challenge as well, to enter a server market dominated by its traditional partners such as HP, Dell and IBM and, hence, antagonize them. This is inevitable, because wherever Cisco goes for growth, it is going to step on somebody’s toes.
Datacenter design is changing rapidly to meet the demands of massive amounts of data being driven largely by video applications. With the benefits of virtualization at hand, designers are beginning to take a top-down view of the datacenter. Cisco has teamed up with the leader in the space, VMWare, and storage behemoth EMC to just do that. In addition, Cisco also has partnered with NetApp in its grand vision of the USC- Unified Computing System.
The basic question may be, why does Cisco really care about server virtualization?
One possible answer: In a datacenter, each virtual machine mimics a physical server. Obviously, Cisco cares about any technology that increases bandwidth usage and thereby helps sell its mainstay routers and switches. Some examples are video like TelePresence, WebEx, and now Flip Video. Cisco wants to accelerate the adoption of 10Gb/s port usage so it can start building the 40Gb/s and 100Gb/s gears of the future. Datacenters are the first places that can happen. However HP, DELL and IBM are neither in a hurry nor motivated to provide their server blades with 10Gb/s ports yet. They appear to be content with the existing 1Gb/s ports. So, Cisco saw an opportunity to push its 10Gb/s adoption in server virtualization. Instead of waiting for other companies, Cisco is now building blade servers for the datacenter that are customized for server virtualization. These blades provide up to 1Gb/s pipe to each virtual machine, which would mean more 10Gb/s ports at the backend of the datacenter, helping in Cisco’s 10Gb/s push.
An alternate possible answer as to why Cisco cares about server virtualization: HP has recently stepped up its efforts in building networking gear, stepping on Cisco’s toes. HP’s Procurve product line seems to be gaining traction among its enterprise customers. In addition, with the acquisition of one of Cisco’s largest customers, EDS, HP is beginning to challenge Cisco’s dominance in the market. By some accounts, HP is the second-largest networking gear vendor.
Perhaps the reason is a combination of both the answers or there may be a third one. However, Cisco definitely has the wherewithal - money, technical prowess, innovative spirit, and great leadership in John Chambers - to deliver on the promise of its vision - UCS.
Conclusion: Admittedly, this is a very big vision. In hard times, Cisco re-invents itself as it has done many times in the past. I believe it has the fundamentals, savvy management and competitive spirit to pull off this one as well.
Tags: data center virtualization
Posted in Data Center, Networking, Rajan Varadarajan, Semiconductor, Software, Solar, Technology | No Comments »
